goose
4:08 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
would you rather be Ortiz or Wilder? you can hand out as many lessons as you want, but if he eventually KOs you then its a bit pointless.
Fury had the power and skill to stop Wilder second time around, maybe thats the only way to beat him?
|
Mr Kenzo
4:02 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
Ortiz gave Wilder a boxing lesson too before getting banged out
|
Block
3:58 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
He got schooled in both matches, typically he had a punchers chance and got lucky in the last round with the knock down.
Saved him the decision IMO
|
goose
3:52 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
Eggbert Nobacon 3:39 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
off nights but he only lost one of those 4 fights on paper.
if you are constantly KO'ing people does the rest really matter?
lets be honest, he lost/drew the first fight but came very close to winning it.
|
Mace66
3:48 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
Block 3:26 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
Because you cannot teach natural ability, 66 son.
It was a rhetorical question Block, i'm fully aware that Wilder has no chance when/if there's a #3.
|
Block
3:40 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
Fury took 2 punches from wilder.
|
Eggbert Nobacon
3:39 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
goose 3:19 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
a week ago Wilder was the baddest man on the planet.
pretty sure most would have had him down to beat Whyte, but that Fury fight has changed everything.
maybe Wilder just had an off night?
that would make it 4 off nights i a row as he looked terrible vs Ortiz and as saved by the doctor in the first fight, lost the 1st Fry fight to anyone except the judges and got wiped out Saturday
|
chim chim cha boo
3:32 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
It's impossible to predict the outcome of two big punchers like Wilder and Whyte but Fury took plenty of big rights against Wilder and shrugged them off and smashed him primarily with his jab and body shots.
Retire? Fury is easily the best heavyweight exponent of the sweet science in the world and is totally in his prime at 31.
The only boxer who can fuck Fury up is Fury himself.
|
Steven P
3:31 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
Hallerinthemorning 3:20 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
Again, stop showing yourself up. Just because trundle says it, doesn’t mean it’s true. Yes there would be a certain draw for an American vs and American in the USA. Have a look at the figures generated. Think about where the fight could have happened, add in PPV and then merchandise. Also what about the split? How would that have played out. You simply don’t know so don’t continue to make stuff up.
You are obviously rattled as you mention it more than once. Have a look back and see who insults who first. Whilst there and go back to when you were first called out in the thread and answer the questions on these boxers your apparently sponsor and your cringeworthy comment about being in the know on boxing.
No rude comment, no insult, you have simply shown you have a very small and narrow minded view of boxing whilst trying your hardest to prove that you know something.
But as you’re out, you won’t reply to this will you...
|
Block
3:26 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
Because you cannot teach natural ability, 66 son.
|
Mace66
3:23 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
I would say Wilder has no chance, but Fury came back from being a ginormous fat cunt , piss head, druggie, mentalist
So why can't Wilder come back from a 40lb cossie
|
goose
3:21 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
bit unfair making him fight with only one hand.
|
Hallerinthemorning
3:20 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
Thank you Lee. I will now out on that note. Steven P I'm sure is a nice bloke but he is arguing a point that just isnt correct and apparently now has rattled me. Could have had a sensible chat and I could have taught him something on this subject having been in boxing for years however, it resorts to name calling so I'm out. Rattled.
|
Block
3:20 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
goose, I've always said take away Wilders right hand and he's absolutely shocking.
|
goose
3:19 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
a week ago Wilder was the baddest man on the planet.
pretty sure most would have had him down to beat Whyte, but that Fury fight has changed everything.
maybe Wilder just had an off night?
|
Lee Trundle
3:18 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
Wildedr would have got paid more money to fight Ortiz, Breazeale and Stiverne than he would have got fighting Whyte in the US.
It shouldn't really be up for discussion.
|
Mace66
3:18 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
Mr Kenzo 9:41 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
Mace,
I thought the Lobsters cost €200 not $200
That's right and why i said 'about' $9,000,200
swt
|
Block
3:18 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
Whyte in an interview said he'd been chasing Wilder for 3 years, saying he would have damaged Wilder more so. He's also offered Ruiz a fight 3 times and he rejected it as well.
Hearne is a fucking disgrace not getting Whyte another title fight, but he loves Joshua that much he won't allow it until Fury and or Wilder offer him a chance.
which, I doubt is likely to happen anytime soon either.
|
Steven P
3:14 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
Hallerinthemorning 3:10 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
Huh? I haven’t mentioned scared once but keep trying. I do think he avoided Whyte and Joshua as well to be honest because there were easier fights. If you don’t think boxers pick and choose as much as the rules allow them then you are a bit simple.
|
Block
3:12 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
Wilder would not KO Whyte.
Not on your fucking nelly.
|
Steven P
3:12 Wed Feb 26
Re: Wilder v Fury 2
|
I see you are obviously rattled being pulled up on your complete nonsense and trying your best to put words into my mouth. I think Wilder doesn’t really have a lot to his game but never called him a bum.
Is this the same Fury who has already said he is happy to have the third fight if Wilder wants it? Strange but I guess you know more than the bloke himself.
Proving you don’t really know a lot here mate, to be honest.
|
| 
